## 18.10. References 181-200

> 181

> Wen, C. Y. and Yu, Y. H.,

> “Mechanics of Fluidization”

> Chem. Eng. Prog. Symp. Ser. 62, pp. 100-111, 1966.

> 182

> Choi, C. R. and Huh, K. Y.,

> "Development and validation of a coherent flamelet model for a spark-ignited turbulent premixed flame in a closed vessel,"

> Combustion & Flame Vol. 114, No. 3-4, 336-348, 1998.

> 183

> A. M. Douaud, P.Eyzat,

> “Four-Octane-Number Method for Predicting the Anti-Knock Behavior of Fuels and Engines”,

> SAE Technical Paper 780080, SAE, 1978.

> 184

> M. P. Halstead, L. J. Kirsch, C. P. Quinn,

> “The Autoignition of Hydrocarbon Fuels at High Temperatures and Pressures – Fitting of a Mathematical Model”,

> Combustion and Flame, Vol. 30, pp. 45-60, 1977.

> 185

> H. O. Hardenberg, F.W. Hase,

> “An Empirical Formula for Computing the Pressure Rise Delay of a Fuel from Its Cetane Number and from the Relevant Parameters of Direct-Injection Diesel Engines”,

> SAE Technical Paper 790493, SAE, 1979.

> 186

> Meneveau, C., and Poinsot, T.,

> “Stretching and quenching of flamelets in premixed turbulent combustion”,

> Combustion and Flame, 86:311-332, 1991.

> 187

> T. Poinsot, D. Veynante,

> “Theoretical and Numerical Combustion”,

> Edwards, 2001.

> 188

> Wallin, S. and Johansson A.,

> “A complete explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model for incompressible and compressible flows”,

> Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 403, pp. 89-132, 2000.

> 189

> Wallin, S., and Johansson A.,

> “Modelling streamline curvature effects in explicit algebraic Reynolds stress turbulence models”,

> International journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 23(5), pp. 721-730, 2002.

> 190

> Hellsten, A.,

> “New advanced turbulence model for high-lift aerodynamics”,

> AIAA Paper 2004-1120, Reno, Nevada, 2004.

> 191

> Spalart, P.R., and Shur, M.

> “On the sensitization of turbulence models to rotation and curvature”,

> Aerospace Sci. Tech., 1(5), pp. 297-302, 1997.

> 192

> Smirnov, P.E., and Menter, F.R.

> “Sensitization of the SST turbulence model to rotation and curvature by applying the Spalart-Shur correction term”,

> ASME Paper GT 2008-50480, Berlin, Germany, 2008.

> 193

> Coleman, H.W., Hodge, B.K., Taylor, R.P.,

> “A Re-Evaluation of Schlichting’s Surface Roughness Experiment”,

> Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 106, 1984.

> 194

> Lechner, R., and Menter, F.,

> “Development of a rough wall boundary condition for -based turbulence models”,

> Technical Report ANSYS / TR-04-04, 2004.

> 195

> Pimenta, M.M., Moffat, R.J. and Kays, W.M.,

> “ The Turbulent Boundary Layer: An Experimental Study of the Transport of Momentum and Heat with the Effect of Roughness”,

> Interim Report Stanford University, CA, 1975.

> 196

> Launder, B.E.,

> “Second-moment closure: present … and future”.

> Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 282-300, 1989.

> 197

> Egorov, Y., and Menter, F.,

> “Development and Application of SST-SAS Turbulence Model in the DESIDER Project”,

> Second Symposium on Hybrid RANS-LES Methods, Corfu, Greece, 2007.

> 198

> Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P., Cabot, W.H.,

> “A Dynamic Subgrid-Scale Eddy Viscosity Model”,

> Phys. Fluids A 3 (7), pp. 1760-1765, 1991.

> 199

> Lilly, D.K.,

> “A Proposed Modification of the Germano Subgrid-Scale Closure Method”,

> Phys. Fluids A 4 (3), pp. 633-635, 1992.

> 200

> Nicoud, F., Ducros, F.,

> “Subgrid-Scale Stress Modelling Based on the Square of the Velocity Gradient Tensor”,

> Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 62, pp. 183-200, 1999.

Release 18.2 - © ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.