25.2 BIOELECTRIC BASIS OF IMPEDANCE PLETHYSMOGRAPHY
where DZ = impedance change [W/m³] t0, t1 = time instants Ds = conductivity change between the two time instants [S/m = 1/W·m] LE
= lead field of the voltage measurement electrodes for unit reciprocal current [1/m2] LI
= lead field of the current feeding electrodes for unit current [1/m2] v = volume [m3]
25.3.1 Measurement of the Impedance of the Thorax
25.3.2 Simplified Model of the Impedance of the Thorax
In a very simple model, the impedance of the thorax can be considered to be divided into two parts: the impedance of both tissue and fluids, as illustrated in Figure 25.5. If the patient does not breathe, all components forming the impedance of the thorax are constant, except the amount and distribution of blood.
The amount of blood in the thorax changes as a function of the heart cycle. During systole, the right ventricle ejects an amount of blood into the lungs which equals the stroke volume. At the same time blood flows from the lungs to the left atrium. The effect of these changes in the distribution of blood in the thorax as a function of the heart cycle can be determined by measuring the impedance changes of the thorax. The problem is to determine cardiac stroke volume as a function of changes in thoracic impedance.
Fig. 25.5 Simplified cylindrical model of the average thorax containing a uniform blood and tissue compartment for determining the net torso impedance.
25.3.3 Determining Changes in Blood Volume in the Thorax
To relate blood volume changes to impedance changes, we use the simplified model of the thorax, described in Figure 25.5. We designate the cross sections of blood and tissue and their longitudinal impedances by Ab, At, Zb, and Zt, respectively. The total longitudinal impedance of the model is
![]() ![]() | (25.6) |
where | Z | = longitudinal impedance of the model |
Zb | = impedance of the blood volume | |
Zt | = impedance of the tissue volume |
The relationship between the impedance change of the thorax and the impedance change of the blood volume is found by differentiating Equation 25.6 with respect to Zb:
![]() ![]() | (25.7) |
The impedance of the blood volume with blood resistivity rb based on the cylindrical geometry of Figure 25.5, is:
(25.8)
where rb = blood resistivity Ab = cross-section of the blood area l = length of the thorax model
The relationship between changes in blood volume vb and the blood volume impedance is found by solving for the blood volume in Equation 25.8 and differentiating:
(25.9)
where vb = blood volume
We finally derive the dependence of the change in blood volume on the change in thoracic impedance by solving for dZb in Equation 25.7 and substituting it into Equation 25.9:
(25.10)
25.3.4 Determining the Stroke Volume
When determining stroke volume from thoracic impedance changes, Kubicek and colleagues (1966) and Kubicek (1968) made some assumptions concerning the relationship between stroke volume and net change in the thorax blood volume as evaluated in Equation 25.10. These assumptions are highly simplified and may be unreliable.
As was mentioned earlier, during systole, the right ventricle ejects a volume of blood into the lungs. Subsequently, blood flows away from the lungs to the left atrium. The stroke volume can thus be determined from the impedance curve by extrapolating to the impedance (DZ), that would result if no blood were to flow out of the lungs during systole. (The underlying assumption is that DZ is determined mainly by changes in lung conductivity.)
In this extrapolation, it is assumed that if no blood were to flow away from the thorax during systole, the thorax impedance would continuously decrease during systole at a rate equal to the maximum rate of decrease of Z. Thus, DZ can be approximated graphically by drawing a tangent to the impedance curve at the point of its maximum rate of decrease, as illustrated in Figure 25.6. Then, the difference between the impedance values of the tangent line at the beginning and at the end of the ejection time is DZ.
The value of DZ is easy to determine with the help of the first derivative curve of the thoracic impedance signal. According to the definition of the derivative:
(25.11)
Assuming that Dt equals the ejection time te, DZ can be determined from equation
(25.12)
With the above assumptions, the impedance change DZ can be determined by multiplying the ejection time by the minimum value of the first derivative of the impedance curve (that is, the maximum slope magnitude; the reader must remember that the slope is negative).
Finally, the formula for determining the stroke volume is obtained by substituting Equation 25.12 into Equation 25.10, which gives:
(25.13)
where SV = stroke volume [ml] rb = resistivity of the blood [W·cm] l = mean distance between the inner electrodes [cm] Z = mean impedance of the thorax [W] = absolute value of the maximum deviation of the first derivative signal during systole [W/s] te = ejection time [s]
The ejection time can be determined from the first-derivative impedance curve with the help of the phonocardiogram or carotid pulse. Then, the impedance curve itself is used only for control purposes (e.g., checking the breathing).
The resistivity of the blood is of the order of 160 Wcm. Its value depends on hematocrit, as discussed in Section 7.4.
25.3.5 Discussion of the Stroke Volume Calculation Method
The method described above, developed by Kinnen and Kubicek, is widely used to estimate stroke volume from impedance recordings. We discuss later efforts to identify the source or sources of the measured changes in impedance. It will be seen that such research implicates changes in blood volume in the vena cava, atria, ventricles, aorta, thoracic musculature, and lungs. Obviously, the two-compartment model, above, is a gross simplification. Furthermore, the assumed cylindrical geometry is also a highly simplified approximation. And, finally, the change of blood conductivity with change in velocity has been entirely neglected in this model.
25.4 ORIGIN OF IMPEDANCE SIGNAL IN IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY
25.4.2 Animal and Human Studies
Compared to the model studies, some practical experiments performed on animals gave different results concerning the origin of the signal. Baker, Hill, and Pale (1974) cite an experiment performed on a calf in which the natural heart was replaced by an implanted prosthesis containing artificial right and left ventricles. In this experiment the ventricles were operated either simultaneously or separately. The contribution of the left ventricle to the impedance signal was 62% of the total signal whereas that from the right ventricle was 38%.
Witsoe and Kottke (1967) conducted experiments with dogs, using venous occlusion achieved by an inflated ball. In these experiments the origin of the impedance signal was found to be contributed totally by the left ventricle. (This is also seen in humans.) Stroke volume measurements with impedance plethysmography on patients with aortic valve insufficiency give values that are too high.
Penney (1986) summarized a number of studies and estimated, on the base of these observations, the contributions to the impedance signal shown in Table 25.1.
Contributing organ | Contribution |
Vena cava and right atrium | +20% |
Right ventricle | -30% |
Pulmonary artery and lungs | +60% |
Pulmonary vein and left atrium | +20% |
Left ventricle | -30% |
Aorta and thoracic musculature | +60% |
Source: Penney (1986) |
Mohapatra (1981) conducted a critical analysis of a number of hypotheses concerning the origin of the cardiac impedance signal. He concluded that it was due to cardiac hemodynamics only. Furthermore, the signal reflects both a change in the blood velocity as well as change in blood volume. The changing speed of ejection has its primary effect on the systolic behavior of DZ whereas the changing volume (mainly of the atria and great veins) affects the diastolic portion of the impedance curve.
These facts point out that the weakest feature of impedance plethysmography is that the source of the signal is not accurately known. Additional critical comments may be found in Mohapatra (1988).
25.4.3 Determining the Systolic Time Intervals from the Impedance Signal
Lababidi et al. (1970) carefully studied the timing of each significant notch in the first derivative curve of the thoracic impedance signal and assigned them to certain events in the heart cycle. According to their study, the relationship is as shown in Table 25.2 (see also Figure 25.3).
Event in the cardiac cycle | Notch |
Atrial contraction | A |
Closure of tricuspid valve | B |
Closure of aortic valve | X |
Closure of pulmonic valve | Y |
Opening snap of mitral valve | O |
Third heart sound | Z |
Source: Lababidi et al., (1970) |
The first-derivative impedance curve can be used with some accuracy in timing various events in the cardiac cycle. The ejection time can be determined as the time between where the dZ/dt curve crosses the zero line after the B point, and the X point. However, in general, the determination of ejection time from the dZ/dt curve is more complicated. Thus, the need of the phonocardiogram in determining the ejection time depends on the quality and clarity of the dZ/dt curve. Though the timing of the various notches of the dZ/dt curve is well known, the origins of the main deflections are not well understood.
25.4.4 The Effect of the Electrodes
In impedance plethysmography, the current is fed from a constant current generator to the thorax by an electrode pair, and the voltage generated by this current is measured by another electrode pair. With a well-designed constant current generator the current in the thorax can be maintained constant despite electrode skin resistance changes. The mean impedance of the thorax is about 20 W. Consequently, the source impedance for the detected voltage is very low. If the voltmeter circuit is designed to have a high input impedance, the contact resistance can be neglected. In commercially manufactured equipment, the impedance is about 100 kW, in comparison to which the effects of contact impedance changes lie within an acceptable level (Kubicek, 1968).
Hill, Jaensen, and Fling (1967) have introduced a critical comment concerning the effect of the contact impedance on the signal: they claim that the entire signal is an electrode artifact. Based on the preceding arguments and the experiments concerning the origin of the signal (Lababidi et al., 1971; Baker, Hill, and Pale, 1974) these claims can be ignored.
The effect of changes in the mean thoracic impedance has also been investigated (Hill and Lowe, 1973). Placement of a defibrillator back electrode under the back of a supine patient changed the mean impedance recorded by the instrument by up to 20%, but did not have any significant influence on the stroke volume value determined by the instrument, because of a simultaneous change in (dZ/dt)min, which compensated for the change in Z. This is easily seen by noting that stroke volume is proportional to Z-2, whereas dZ is proportional to Z2. Slight displacement of the detector electrodes changes the measured mean impedance and first derivative signal, but their effect on the computed stroke volume is compensated by the changed value of the mean distance of the electrodes. This is also easy to prove using the previous theory. It is also interesting to note that the signals remain unchanged when one half of the lower detector electrode is removed (Hill and Lowe, 1973). This implies that the electrode is situated on an equipotential surface, thus supporting the assumption of cylindrical symmetry.
25.4.5 Accuracy of the impedance cardiography
Today, more than one hundred publications exist on the accuracy of impedance cardiography. Lamberts, Visser, and Ziljstra (1984) have made an extensive review of 76 studies. In this chapter we discuss some representative studies where the accuracy of impedance cardiography has been evaluated. These can be divided into two main categories. In the first category the effect of the hematocrit on the blood resistivity is ignored and a constant value is used in the calculations for the resistivity of blood, usually 150 Wcm. In the second category, the value of the blood resistivity is first determined for each subject.
Experiments Where the Blood Resistivity is Constant
Kinnen and co-workers (1964b) determined the stroke volume from the equation
(25.14)
where DZ = change of the impedance of the thorax Z = mean value of the impedance of the thorax vtx = volume of the thorax between the inner electrode pair
They used the Fick principle as a reference for evaluating stroke volume. (The Fick principle determines the cardiac output from the oxygen consumption and the oxygen contents of the atrial and venous bloods.) In a study of six subjects at various exercise levels, the correlation between the impedance and Fick cardiac outputs was r = 0.962, with an estimated standard error of 12% of the average value of the cardiac output.
Harley and Greenfield (1968) performed two series of experiments with simultaneous dye dilution and impedance techniques. They estimated DZ from the impedance curve itself, instead of using the first-derivative technique. In the first experiment, 13 healthy male subjects were examined before and after an intravenous infusion of isoproterenol. The mean indicator dilution cardiac output was 6.3
/min before and 9.5
/min after infusion. The ratios of the cardiac outputs measured with impedance plethysmography and indicator dilution were 1.34 and 1.23, respectively. This difference (p > .2) was not significant. The second experiment included 24 patients with heart disease, including aortic and mitral insufficiencies. A correlation coefficient of r = .26 was obtained for this data. The poor correlation was caused in those cases with aortic and mitral insufficiency.
Bache, Harley, and Greenfield (1969) performed an experiment with eight patients with various types of heart disease excluding valvular insufficiencies. As a reference they used the pressure gradient technique. Individual correlation coefficients ranged from .58 to .96 with an overall correlation coefficient as low as .28.
Baker et al. (1971) compared the impedance and radioisotope dilution values of cardiac output for 17 normal male subjects before and after exercise. The regression function for this data was COZ = 0.80·COI + 4.3 with a correlation coefficient r = .58. The comparison between the paired values before and after exercise showed better correlation for the impedance technique. Baker examined another group of 10 normal male subjects by both impedance and dye techniques. In 21 measurements the regression function was COZ = 1.06·COD + 0.52, with correlation coefficient r = .68. In addition to this set of data, the impedance cardiac output was determined by using individual resistivity values determined from the hematocrit. The relation between resistivity and Hct was, however, not mentioned.
In this case, the regression function was COZ = 0.96·COD + 0.56 with correlation coefficient r = .66. A set of measurements was performed also on 11 dogs using electromagnetic flowmeters and the impedance technique. A comparison of 214 paired data points was made with intravenous injections of epinephrine, norepinephrine, acetylcholine, and isoproterenol. Values of the correlation coefficients from each animal ranged from 0.58 to 0.98 with a mean value of 0.92. The first two experiments of this paper are also presented in Judy et al. (1969).
Experiments with Individual Resistivity Values
Lababidi et al. (1971) studied 95 children with various types of congenital heart disease using dye dilution and Fick principles as reference methods. In 20 subjects, paired impedance-dye dilution values had an average absolute difference of 6.6% ranging from -12% to +13% with a standard deviation of 0.259 /min/m². Paired impedance-cardiac output values had an absolute difference of 3.1%, ranging from -15% to +3.2% with a standard deviation of 0.192
/min/m². The F-test showed the reproducibility of both methods to be similar: F = 1.82 and p > .05. For 53 sequential determinations of impedance cardiac output and dye dilution, the absolute mean difference was -1.8%, t = 1.19 and p &"62; .05. When determining, sequentially, the relationship between Fick and dye dilution principles, 37 of 39 points fell within 20% limits. The absolute mean difference was 8.3%, and the algebraic mean difference was +3.4%. The correlation between impedance and Fick cardiac outputs was r = .97. These studies were performed with patients without intracardiac shunts or valvular insufficiencies.
A comparison of impedance cardiac output to Fick systemic cardiac output in patients with left to right shunts showed the correlation to be poor: r = .21. However, a comparison of the impedance cardiac output to the Fick pulmonary blood flow in these cases gave a correlation of r = .96 (see Fig. 25.9).
Baker, Hill, and Pale (1974) compared impedance and dye dilution cardiac outputs in three dogs and got a correlation of r = .879.
Malmivuo (1974) compared impedance and Fick methods in 18 patients without valvular incompetencies, but with one subject having a left to right shunt. For this special subject a comparison was made to pulmonary blood flow. The regression function was COZ = 0.97·COF + 0.45 yielding a correlation coefficient of r = .97 (see Figure 25.8).
Malmivuo, Orko, and Luomanmäki (1975) compared impedance and Fick methods in 11 patients with atrial fibrillation and without intracardiac shunts or valvular insufficiencies. The regression function was COZ = 1.05·COF + 0.1, with a correlation coefficient of r = .96.
Other Studies
Additional studies of the correlation between impedance methods and cardiac output reference techniques are summarized in Penney (1986). The results are generally similar to those described above. From these studies one can conclude that impedance cardiography is satisfactory for the determination of relative cardiac output for most normals. Under conditions of hypoxia, drugs, ventilatory maneuvers, and so on, the correlation may become poor.
In evaluating the significance of a particular correlation coefficient between impedance and reference methods, Penney points out that the reference methods themselves are not completely consistent. For example, if one considers the correlation coefficient r, then between Fick and dye dilution .95 < r < .999; Fick and thermodilution .70 < r < .99; Fick to carbon dioxide breathing, r = .94; dye to thermodilution, .68 < r < .99.
25.5 OTHER APPLICATIONS OF IMPEDANCE PLETHYSMOGRAPHY
25.5.3 Intrathoracic Fluid Volume
25.5.4 Determination of Body Composition
Cole KS, Cole RH (1941): Dispersion and absorption in dielectrics. J. Chem. Physics 9: 341-51.
Schwan HP, Kay CF (1957): Capacitive properties of body tissues. Circ. Res. 5:(4) 439-43.